Bruce Swedien comments
on the recording techniques and production HIStory of Michael Jackson's
latest album
by
Daniel Sweeney
"HIStory" In
The Making
Increasingly, the launch of a new Michael Jackson
collection has taken on the dimensions of a world event. Lest this
be doubted, the videos promoting the King of Pop's latest effort,
"HIStory", depict him with patently obvious symbolism
as a commander of armies presiding over monster rallies of impassioned
followers. But whatever one makes of hoopla surrounding the album,
one can scarcely ignore its amazing production values and the skill
with which truly vast musical resources have been brought to bear
upon the project. Where most popular music makes do with the sparse
instrumentation of a working band fleshed out with a bit of synth,
"HIStory" brings together such renowned studio musicians
and production talents as Slash, Steve Porcaro, Jimmy Jam, Nile
Rodgers, plus a full sixty piece symphony orchestra, several choirs
including the Andrae Crouch Singers, star vocalists such as sister
Janet Jackson and Boys II Men, and the arrangements of Quincy Jones
and Jeremy Lubbock. Indeed, the sheer richness of the instrumental
and vocal scoring is probably unprecedented in the entire realm
of popular recording.
But the richness extends beyond the mere density
of the mix to the overall spatial perspective of the recording.
Just as Phil Spector's classic popular recordings of thirty years
ago featured a signature "wall of sound" suggesting a
large, perhaps overly reverberant recording space, so the recent
recordings of Michael Jackson convey a no less distinctive though
different sense of deep space-what for want of other words one might
deem a "hall of sound".
I found the spatial sense of "HIStory"
so unusual, so unlike the dry, closed-in acoustical perspective
that typifies popular recording today, that I found myself browsing
through the fifty page booklet accompanying the CD in effort to
find some hint of how the effects were achieved. Technical data
were sparse, but I did note that special thanks were extended to
ASC (Acoustic Sciences Corporation) manufacturer of the Tube Trap,
a sound control device frequently utilized to control room modes
in the lower frequencies. Could ASC have devised some new product
for otherwise modifying room acoustics that lay behind the sound
of the album? I wondered. I decided to call up "HIStory's"
chief recording engineer, Bruce Swedien to try to find out.
The Master Speaks
Swedien proved to be surprisingly approachable when I stated the
nature of my call. I say surprisingly because his work for top selling
artists such as Michael Jackson, Quincy Jones, Barbra Streisand,
Sergio Mendes, Herb Alpert and countless other major recording artists
has made him one of the most sought after recording engineers in
the world-and one of the busiest. Not unexpectedly, he was occupied
with not one but several projects at the time I contacted him, but
still he consented to take a good two hours out his crowded schedule
to explain in detail just how he captured the acoustic space that
pervades the performances on "HIStory". His explanations
proved both intriguing and illuminating.
The Stage of HIStory
Yes, Swedien admitted, ASC products did play a prominent
role in the making of "HIStory" and in creating the strikingly
wide, deep stereo image the recording projects over a high quality
playback system. But as Swedien explains it, achieving those effects
wasn't just a matter of throwing up Tube Traps in the corners of
the room per the usual practice. To be sure, Tube Traps were employed
- specifically the free standing Studio Traps which the company
has been making for the last several years-but the method in which
they were employed was somewhat idiosyncratic and ultimately rested
on Swedien's own uniquely personal approach to the whole recording
process.
"HIStory" Lessons
By his own estimate, Swedien is both systematic
and intuitive-a rare combination-and the course he followed in recording
"HIStory" reflects both aspects of his creative personality.
In spite of the meticulous orchestration and sheer polish of the
finished product-surely remarkable in any circumstances given the
complexity of many of the compositions-Swedien claims to have proceeded
through the early stages of the album without fixed notions as to
its final form.
"We spent a year in the studio on this
one, and no, we didn't always begin with firm arrangements,"
Swedien relates. "Each piece of music, each song, had a life
of its own, and each one was done differently. Each kept on growing
through the recording process."
But if the collaborative process between and among
artists, musicians, producers, and recording engineer was fundamentally
unstructured, little was left to chance once the scoring was established
and the performances began in the studio. Swedien proceeded from
a very well formulated recording philosophy, and every effect included
in the production was precisely calculated to be in harmony with
that philosophy.
Swedien went on to explain that his overall approach
to recording rests upon three basic tenets: The final recording
must reflect a "natural balance" of melody, harmony, and
rhythm. "Recording shouldn't be subject to fads or styles,"
he notes. "The correct balance is always the same. Music doesn't
change fundamentally."
At the same time, Swedien believes that the spatial
perspective-that is acoustical sense of the venue and performers'
positions within it-associated with each individual track must also
be consistent with the theme of the music.
"I try to avoid a monochrome stereo
panoramic presentation. In orchestral recording, I always go for
a very wide and dramatic, but accurate stereophonicsterephonic image.
For instance, in the pieces with the full orchestra, "Have
You Seen My Childhood?" and "Smile", I borrowed an
orchestral set-up and stereo miking technique that I used in the
1960's recording some Mahler for RCA Victor Red Seal, with the strings
of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra. From the condutors' point-of-view,
I set up the first violins on the left, with the second violins
on the right side. I set up the violas on the left behind the first
violins with the celli on the right behind the second violins. The
basses are in the middle to the rear of the room. This approach
is just a bit uncommon. I then set up the main orchestral mikes
30 feet above the conductors' head so that these mikes will hear
the orchestral balance in the condutors' perspective."
"In recording the lead and background
vocals, on some pieces, I had Michael back off from the microphone
for a sense of distance, on other songs the vocals are more up front.
I try to keep 'em guessing." Finally Swedien insists that the
recording be "true stereo".
"I always try to preserve a true stereo image.
Most recordings today are what I call two channel mono, and for
that reason they don't have much emotional impact. I use a basic
'X-Y' or 'coincident pair' microphone setup in many of my recordings.
What I frequently do is to place a pair of my Neuman M49's or my
B & K 1006's very close together, and that basic mike set-up
then forms the core of the recording. They're so close-maybe a foot
or less-that the the arrival time of the sound from the sound source
hits the two capsules at essentially the same moment in time. This
way there is virtually no phase difference. As a result the sonic
image that you get has almost no left/right intensity, but you will
get a wide feeling sound field. Also because the arrival of the
sound at the two capsules is so close in time there are virtually
no phase problems. I use a lot of accent mikes to pick up individual
instruments, but that dramatic core of sound is always there."
Space Explorations
Because the spatiality of Swedien's recordings is
so uncharacteristic of popular music in general and so very characteristic
of Swedien's own work as exemplified in "HIStory, it's become
almost a trademark of his style. And because the sense of natural
acoustic space is so startling in the context of a highly layered
recording, a recording painstakingly built up over weeks of remixes,
the usual reaction of his peers is one of incredulity. How does
he do it?
As it turns out, it's a matter both of a broad,
coherent approach and of well worked out techniques for various
situations.
The overall approach might be termed one of audio
verite. Swedien believes that an accurate sense of a real acoustical
space is an essential component in an emotionally valid recording,
and there is no limit to the lengths to which he will go to achieve
it. His commitment is reflected in the quality of product. Any ambience
or reverberation on his recordings are real; a delicate touch of
electronic reverb is used to sweeten relatively dry sound-fields,
never to synthesize a space for the entire performing ensemble.
As for specific techniques, several were used,
all of them, interestingly enough, involving the deployment of Studio
Traps within a large, naturally reverberant space.
"Many of the songs on 'HIStory' were recorded
in Studio One at the Hit Factory which is a very big room with extremely
good acoustical characteristics," Swedien explains. "It's
been fitted with a lot of the RPG devices. Even so I use my own
set of ASC tube traps to tame certain nasty little acoustical "Hot
Spots" that remain. Without the traps, it's a just a little
too bright with a bit of an edge. With the traps, it's just about
right."
Swedien continues, "I like that room a lot,
it's one of my favorite large recording rooms in the entire industry.
In fact, I like it so much that some of the tracks that I hadn't
recorded there initially,(like the synthesizer strings on 'Little
Susie'), I played back over loudspeakers and then rerecorded in
'Studio 1' to get that big room feel. I love early reflections.
They establish the character of the room. They're very difficult
to simulate electronically. I prefer to record them in a natural
setting rather than trying to synthesize them."
Pressed for more details, Swedien supplied some
fascinating specifics as to how he placed mikes, performers, and
acoustical accessories within the big room-specifics that reveal
him as an unapologetic minimalist within the context of current
recording practice.
"I started out doing classical recording for
RCA Victor back in the late fifties. [RCA classical releases from
that period are considered among the best sounding of all time by
many audiophile record collectors.] I still use techniques I learned
then, so when I worked with the orchestra in Studio One while recording
'HIStory', I put the 'X-Y' pair of mikes about thirty feet overhead
just like I did back in the fifties. But what we didn't have then
were Tube Traps, and they're a big part of what I do now. I placed
them behind the conductor, like a little army."
Concerning this use of the Traps, Swedien mentioned
that at first he tried recording the full orchestra without the
Traps, trusting to the natural acoustics of the room. Unfortunately,
the sound proved unsatisfactory regardless of microphone positions,
and after several takes he hauled out the Traps almost as a last
resort.
"The next take was perfect," he relates
and adds that by sending the orchestra home earlier than anticipated
he saved more money than the entire cost of the Tube Traps.
Swedien's concern for correct spatial perspective
also extends to individual instruments and voices, and here again
he finds the Studio Traps useful. When working at this level, he
places the Traps around the individual instruments establishing
a more or less uniform acoustical space within the circle, thanks
to the inherent diffusive properties of the devices (see below),
and coincidentally he achieves from a single microphone position
something very close to subjectively perceived sound of the instrument
in a performance space. Thus way he can refrain from multi-miking
a single instrument, thereby avoiding the time smear and image enlargement
attendant on the practice.
"They're great on voice, too," adds Swedien.
I place them around the vocalist when I record, in fact, I take
them with me wherever I go along with my microphone collection so
I can be sure of getting the effect I want." Indeed, Swedien
used an array of Studio Traps in recording every one of the vocal
tracks on the album.
Swedien finds the Studio Traps particularly useful
for recording Michael Jackson "because he always dances as
he sings even when he's recording." According to Swedien, the
acoustic space created by the Traps allows for consistency of sound
at the mike regardless of position shifts on the part of the performer.
Swedien revealed another trick he uses in recording
Jackson's vocals, a hand-built plywood platform he places under
the artist for an 8" elevation off the floor.
"I originally made the thing for recording
drums, but by experimenting I found that it's good for vocals too.
It's been especially useful on Michael's projects because I try
to make the footsteps part of the rhythm track and at the same time
to preserve a natural perspective on Michael's dancing. On this
particular project I used the platform in conjunction with the Traps
which helped to create a dense pattern of early reflections at the
mike."
Further Space Explorations
Fascinating as I found Bruce Swedien's account of
the recording sessions for "HIStory", I found myself wanting
to know more in a technical sense on how the effects were achieved-in
other words, how the room acoustics are actually modified through
the use of the Traps. What, precisely, was going on inside the Traps
that engendered the remarkable combination of controlled ambience
and superb intelligibility and room articulation that shone through
on every track of the album? In an effort to arrive at some answers
I contacted, Arthur Noxon, the President of Acoustics Sciences Corporation
and the chief architect of the Tube Traps in all of their various
manifestations.
"What
Bruce is doing with trap placement is basically a variation of our
'Quick Sound Field' technique, said Noxon after I'd introduced myself
and explained the nature of my call. "Granted it's a little
unusual, but it's valid. You see, here at ASC we find we can learn
a lot just by giving master recording engineers a device and letting
them work out applications. When we developed the product we certainly
didn't envision all of the possible uses."
It pressed Noxon for details on the Quick Sound
Field, and obviously eager for an audience, he launched into a lengthy
discussion. As he talked, Swedien's recording strategies began to
make more and more sense. According to Noxon, the Quick Sound Field
is "quick" in two senses of the word.
First it is a means of achieving the desired acoustical
properties within a recording or performing space through rapid
deployment of portable acoustical devices rather than costly and
time consuming structural modifications to the venue. "Think
of it as a virtual room of highly predictable characteristics that
maintains those characteristics despite widely varying external
settings," suggests Noxon.
But if the Quick Sound Field is quick to set up,
it's also quick in the sense of fast acting. "The RT-60 time
of a quick sound field is typically under a tenth of a second,"
notes Noxon, "and the group of very early reflections that
make up the decay packet are composed of random time offset specular
reflections whose occurence density is about one thousand per second.
At that point you have an almost instantaneous and truly diffuse
field with no obtrusive reflections or flutter echo."
Noxon proceeded to explain that the success of the
Quick Sound Field technique is made possible by the highly unusual
design of the Studio Trap, the building block of the Quick Sound
Field, and that no other commercially available acoustical device
has the requisite balance of acoustical properties.
Essentially
hollow cylinders whose walls are composed of densely woven fiberglass,
the Studio Traps, by Noxon's account, present impinging soundwaves
with a steep pressure gradient between their highly acoustically
resistive surfaces and their empty interiors. Such a pressure differential
tends to maximize acoustical velocity through the fiberglass which
in turn maximizes absorption, so that a wave front loses substantial
energy as it passes into the low pressure interior space. (Actual
energy conversion occurs due to sheer forces in the boundary layers
of the fibers.) And, because the resistive element is dominant,
which is not the case with acoustic foam, diaphramatic absorbers,
or even multiple helmholtz bass attenuators, absorption is wideband
rather than being concentrated in narrow bands or merely in the
treble range.
At the same time, the entire surface of the studio
trap is providing bass range absorption, half of the trap is also
providing treble range diffusion. The effect becomes clear if the
Tube Trap is rotated on axis. As you speak the words "check,
check, check, testing one, two, three," the fully absorptive
section of the trap sounds perfectly dead as one would expect. Then
the surprise. As you come into proximity to the diffusive side of
the Trap, the sound becomes bright, fresh, and clear.
"This hybrid acoustic is made possible by the
suspension of a thin, precisely weighted, and perforated sheet of
limp plastic that covers the front half of the cylinder surface.
The properties of the diffusor sheet are such as to make it an acoustical
crossover, passing low frequencies into the interior but back scattering
high frequencies.
Studio traps are free standing, tripod mounted,
height adjustable devices intended for use in the nearfield. Because
they are height adjustable they may be used with seated or standing
performers. Furthermore, they are easily rotated to situate the
perforated, limp mass reflective membrane either toward or away
from the sound source.
When the limp mass is facing the source, the effect
of the trap is predominantly diffusive toward that source, while
when the limp mass is turned away, the trap's effect is primarily
absorptive. In effect the trap is an acoustical diode, passing soundwaves
in one direction and opposing them in the opposite direction.
By virtue of their dual functionality, absorptive
and diffusive, studio traps may be deployed in an almost infinite
variety of formations, according to the acoustical effects desired.
But in the Quick Sound Field application, the traps are normally
placed in a ring around the performer(s) with the diffusive surfaces
facing inward toward the microphone. This is essentially what Swedien
did in his recording sessions for History.
This arrangement has manifold acoustical consequences:
First of all, a pattern of specularly diffuse early
reflections is scattered back toward the microphone, creating a
repeatable and subjectively pleasing acoustical signature. At the
same time, sound from outside the ring is attenuated by the outwardly
facing absorptive surfaces of the traps, providing a considerable
degree of isolation-and suppressing room resonances and flutter
echoes as Swedien noted.
Finally, sound from the performance passing through
the spaces between the traps is subject to some degree of diffractive
diffusion which serves to enrich the reverberant field in the overall
recording space.
Interestingly, the Quick Sound Field can also serve
as a sort of gobo, an application used or endorsed by performers
and engineers such as Sting, Gino Vanelli, and Roger Nicholls, among
others. When individual Quick Sound Fields are established around
each performer, they will serve to control spill to microphones
assigned to individual voices and instruments and afford a high
degree of isolation just as would a conventional plywood and fiberglass
gobo. But unlike the traditional gobo, which isolates very effectively
in the treble but has negligible effect at low frequencies, the
Quick Sound Field achieves broadband attenuation while imposing
a diffuse character on the leakage and thereby rendering it relatively
benign.
The effectiveness of the Quick Sound Field in this
regard may be clearly discerned on the tracks in "HIStory"
with orchestral scoring. Vocals always remain clear and articulate
in spite of the proximity of the orchestra.
Because individual traps are completely portable,
the ring of traps can be of any diameter and can utilize any number
of traps, and this utter flexibility in deployment allows for infinite
variability in the pattern of early reflections and the degree of
isolation from the external environment. The ring itself becomes
a drive control, permitting the session engineer to vary the natural
proportion of natural room ambience to the virtual room ambience
created by the quick sound field itself. In the case of the "HIStory"
sessions, the drive level of the room itself was turned way up by
means of a wide, open arrangement of the traps. And for the vocal
tracks of Jackson himself, some twenty Studio Traps were set around
the eight foot square singers' platform.
There are other benefits as well. One aspect of
the Quick Sound Field which endears it to Swedien and other recording
engineers who've used the array successfully is the forgiving nature
of the Sound Field in regard to the placement of the performers
within the space enclosed by the Sound Field. Because of the density
of reflections within the Haas effect, differences in the timing
of these reflection arising from shifts in microphone position are
largely imperceptible.
Furthermore, within Quick Sound Fields of similar
composition, there's a very high degree of repeatability and predictability,
regardless of the room in which it is placed. Finally, the density
of early reflections tends to create a very convincing "sample"
of the instrument and to override proximity effects that alter timbre
and make microphone setups so ticklish.
And all this ultimately accounts for the enthusiastic
endorsement made by Pete Townsend of the Who some five years ago.
Townsend was one of the first persons to hear the Quick Sound Field
and he quickly put it to use in his synclavier sampling booth at
the EEL PIE studios in London.
Historical Perspective
Aha, I thought to myself when Art Noxon had finally
finished his oral application note. Now I grasped what was going
on in the "HIStory" sessions, and I understood the secret
of the remarkably airy, open sound of the recording.
It was all very simple really.
Broadband specular diffusion developing over very
short time constants accounted for the amazingly natural voicing
of the many acoustical instruments used in the recording.
Each instrument was essentially sampled within its
recording space and the resulting sound came uncannily close to
what a listener would have heard on the spot. The Traps provided
a perspective that could not be achieved by conventional means but
which nonetheless resulted in subjectively greater realism.
The expansive hall sound arose from real instruments
playing in a room of large dimensions, but here again the Traps
played a role by defeating flutter echo and controlling low frequency
modes. In essence the room was helped, but it remained in the equation.
Finally the traps provided a means of combining
minimalist spaced omni miking with multi-track production techniques,
allowing for both a cohesive, enveloping ambience not possible with
shrouds or gobos, and at the same time a precision of localization
normally only possible through separate recordings in booths.
When you realize that just one simple, passive acoustical
device could produce so many subtle and sophisticated effects, you
can't help but marvel. But then simplicity defines Swedien's approach
and that's probably what led him to experiment with the Traps in
the first place.
After all, he recorded most of the "HIStory"
album on his own analog 24 track deck, and he placed a minimum of
reliance on electronic processing. Real instruments in real acoustical
spaces formed the musical bedrock for the production, and much of
the drama of the actual performance arose from the now almost unheard
of situation of a singer interacting with a full symphony orchestra.
In such an environment the versatile and understated Studio Trap
was a natural addition.
So thank you, Bruce Swedien, for sharing your insights,
and thank you Art Noxon, for a timely science lesson. It's not every
day that one learns something new in the recording business.
CLOSING
THE CIRCLE WITH THE ATTACK WALL
Long an advocate of ASC acoustical devices in the
recording space, Bruce Swedien has recently come to appreciate them
in the control room as well. Swedien became a believer when Art
Noxon of ASC showed up at the home studio of Rene Moore, Swedien's
co-writer and quickly outfitted the booth with a flying squadron
of Studio Traps which Noxon likes to call the "Attack Wall".
Swedien professes to be amazed at the results.
"I've never used Traps around the console previously,"
confesses Swedien, "but I was very enthusiastic about what
I heard. The imaging was panoramic, and yet the clarity was phenomenal.
I was so impressed that I decided to do the same thing in my own
home studio."
During his initial encounter with the Attack Wall
Swedien quickly took the measure of the system with the ultimate
evaluative tool, his own low generation master recordings. Swedien
often travels with a collection of his hits which he uses as a reference
for sizing up remote recording locations.
With the attack wall in place, he found himself
re-evaluating the reference. "Suddenly I was hearing microphone
placements that I knew I'd used on the recordings but which I'd
never heard clearly on any system before. It wasn't a matter of
making allowances for differences any more, this was the way the
recordings were meant to be heard."
The deployment that Swedien experienced usually
involves a dozen or more Traps, depending upon the size of the console.
Closely spaced Traps are placed between the speakers, directly in
front of console and flanking the speakers on either side, the entire
arrangement forming a shallow arc. In addition, a shorter arc of
Traps is placed behind the engineer's chair, with spacing between
the Traps amounting to roughly a foot.
Front Traps will all have their absorptive halves
turned toward the chair, while the rear Traps will alternatively
have reflectors oriented toward the chair in deep spaces or away
from it in shallower spaces. The arrangement provides an otherwise
untreated control room with LEDE characteristics and also supports
midbass output from the monitors by providing a virtual soffit loading
(Traps only provide pressure relief damping below 100Hz when placed
out in the room in this manner). Moreover, undesirable floor reflections
are attenuated.
"It's really a midfield more than a nearfield
monitoring environment," says Swedien, "but both the spectral
balance and the imaging are excellent. I'll be using it a lot in
the future."
Daniel Sweeney has been a freelance writer for
over 15 years. He has written on subjects such as audio, computer
networking, wireless and cellular communication, video, film and
electronics.